The Paycheck Fairness Act's realpolitik | Naomi Wolf

On average, women represent only 77 cents for every dollar men receive. But demagoguery election year has paid attention to the equity value

Again, with depressing regularity, another bill to make it easier to fight for equal pay between men and women has been the subject of debate Congress. And once again, we are bombarded with misleading scholarships funded think tanks interested.

Is it a dead issue, as - and if so, is one of the main justifications for the claim that feminism is not necessary, right? Unfortunately, the answer is a resounding "no".

Paycheck Fairness Act oppose were stealthy and effective debate to disseminate misinformation. Iteration very worn on television and in magazines wise analysis is that the wage gap is actually due to a "breach of options" - which means that, nowadays, any wage gap between men and women should be only with different life choices women make. They say women are opting for a "mommy track", for example, or professions that offer greater freedom to stay home with the children.

National Center for Women Act (NWLC) has been targeting these hoaxes for years, arguing that the wage gap "is not simply a matter of choice in employment" for women are "generally paid less than men in the same profession," regardless of the wage level.

The truth is that women working full-time are paid on average 77 cents for every dollar earned by a white man in the United States. The situation is even worse for black and Hispanic women, who earn 62 and 54 cents, respectively, for every dollar a white man.

According to a fact sheet (pdf) prepared by the NWLC, the annual gap between women and white men a total of $ 10,784, and the trend is that volume growth in recent years, especially for university graduates. Emphasizes the organization:

"Even when women are career opportunities as men work the same hours and earn less."

And as women age, the sex wage gap is increasing. This may help explain why so many young women think it is a very important thing, while older women do not wake up to the magnitude of systemic injustice until is too late to act organized many.

Who would be against equity compensation for the same work, or against a bill to strengthen the role of women as they try to document and challenge demonstrable gender?

• Chambers of Commerce
• powerful in America, that's who. The title sounds familiar, "chamber of commerce", which sounds like "Main Street" is actually a euphemism for Aggregate Global corporate interests - including the interests of the company. A paycheck fairness bill passed in the House of Representatives in January 2009, but was rejected by the Senate in November 2010. Why can not the Senate to pass this law? Because a non-pilot said profits for American companies ... ability to pay women less with impunity.
• women constitute the majority of the population, and are about to be half of its workers. If the wage gap, which remains stable at around 23%, is forced closed, businesses are looking for an increase of 12% of the total workforce - and a corresponding portion of the profits
• This equation was very clear to me early on in life, when work Yale Union - Local 34, a union of food workers who were mostly women - go on strike . They made the case that the gender wage was lower than the norm for men. But the direction of Yale students said, indeed, that the university would not negotiate with the strikers. The reason is simple: if women were paid more equitably, Yale lose the significant benefits that are now gone to cover other expenses. His argument was that Yale could not be profitable to bridge the gap between the sexes: the bank need to balance the benefits that are right on the gender gap. These "savings" for businesses and corporations are easily identifiable throughout the country and, indeed, international -. While women are ill-equipped in the struggle for the rights of equal pay

What is behind this fight, the more resistance companies to take unfair advantage cut aggregates from systematic injustice?

Party policy is the answer: before the Senate vote, the Washington Post reported that the bill will not pass. This result reflects the Post has a strategic advantage for the President's team:. Democrats will use this defeat the Republicans look like they could not care for gender less

Obama team is the calculation of a short-term impact on the business side is compensated by maximizing the gender gap in November - a region that has long been biased toward Democrats but was reduced in the latest polls. Obama is the creation of gender "lens" - including a surprise appearance during a conference call on Equal Remuneration, comfortably, including journalists. With this handy public media, the president makes his case:

Find best price for : --Fairness----Wall----Mitt----Maddow----Post----Washington----Local----Yale----Paycheck--