Obama slams Congress over 'Band-Aid' fix on aviation sequester cuts

President will sign the bill to facilitate the airline industry, but says most deserving sectors continue to suffer cuts

President Barack Obama warned Congress about his "Band-Aid" solution to air traffic delays induced removal, saying Saturday that short-term solutions were irresponsible governing.

On Friday, the House passed a bill to facilitate the trip interruption caused by budget cuts. He took a quick vote in favor by the Senate yesterday. Obama is expected to sign the bill. But in his weekly address Saturday, he chided congressional Republicans to approve relief from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), without regard to other areas affected by the kidnapping.

Obama said: "Because of these irresponsible cuts, there are parents whose children had just been expelled from Head Start programs scrambling for a solution are the elderly who rely on programs like Meals on Wheels looking to live in independent .. There to help the military community - families who have already suffered enough. - Adaptation under new strains all because of these cuts "

Regarding delays in air traffic Obama mocks lawmakers in Washington, suggesting that it was only because "go home every weekend" that many members of Congress " who insisted the cuts beware, they finally realized that they actually apply to them too. "

bill before Friday, hundreds of flights were canceled and thousands daily are delayed due to forced leave of air traffic controllers. The bill passed by the House does not increase the proportion of the budget of the FAA, but allows some flexibility in how to spend it. It allows the body to modify $ 253 million from other parts of its budget to compensate for staff remuneration.

• The FAA said Saturday that the light of recent events, he had suspended leave. It is expected that the U.S. airline to be back to normal Sunday evening.
• The agreement in Congress after the collapse of the Democrats in Congress, who had opposed the exemptions to sequester cuts, saying that if there should be vulnerable social groups. The agreement could pave the way for other stakeholders, such as the large national parks or the Pentagon to seek special treatment. The grant to the airline industry is only the second made by the Congress of the estimated $ 87 billion in sequestration cuts will begin on March 1. The other was to finance food inspectors, fearing health problem.
• In a statement Friday, the Republican chairman of the House John Boehner tried to blame the problems of air circulation at the door of the White House. "The disruption of air traffic system in the United States last week was a result of the decision of the administration to implement reductions removal of the President of the most painful way possible. OF unacceptable that the FAA decided not to make plans for the removal or use the flexibility you have, "he said. "Americans are rightly fed, and it is regrettable that the House and Senate were forced to intervene and resolve the issue when the President decided not to act."
• White House Jay Carney said Obama spokesman sign this bill. But in comments Wednesday, Obama criticized Republicans on the exemption of aviation, which was passed by both houses of Congress, with Democratic support.

"So Congress passed a temporary solution," he said. "A Band-Aid. But these reductions are expected to continue to decline in other parts of the government to provide vital services to the American people. And we can not continue to put bandages on each section, there is a responsible way to govern.

"There is only one way to really solve the kidnapping:. Through its replacement before it causes major damage"

Find best price for : --Congress----Carney----John----Start----Head----Obama--

Bomb kills 9 near Pakistan political party office

Welfare reform is needed but the bedroom tax will end badly

The "tax" recently, whether for compensation or seeking public finances and will likely become the capitation 2013

April Fools' Day has announced the establishment of the "tax" or as David Cameron prefers to call it, the vacation pay. Whatever the terminology, what difference will it make to meet the housing needs and make savings in the protection tab of ? 200 billion in the United Kingdom?

is clear that our social security system should be reformed. It takes little or no resemblance to the system provided by Aneurin Bevan and Sir William Beveridge. In real terms, costs in 1945 are estimated at ? 11 billion. The social security system of the current bill is almost 20 times that amount. Successive governments have included all kinds of benefits in an already too complicated. Take only benefit parents. It is almost impossible to understand and full of hypocrisy, injustice and, in too many cases, the striking results.

welfare system, as well as the nationalization of major industries, the birth of the NHS and a massive increase in housing construction in the public sector has been designed as a system of contributions from taxes and social contributions to create a just and equitable society with safety nets, backups and better conditions of life for UK citizens.

There are 180,000 households will be docked 25% of their housing allowance if they have surplus rooms. However, the policy has little or no effect on the level of the strategic management of public housing in the nation. The real benefit to the public purse is tiny anyway. With more than 600,000 people affected by the changes, 70% are people with disabilities, pensioners and also excluded, leaving little real money to be derived, especially if you consider the bureaucracy.

In recent weeks we have seen the reverse coalition government with grants for foster parents, military families overseas now exempt -. And many others could follow

Many will jump at the chance to move to a smaller home, if one was available and, equally, if the education of their social, family and health could be met. Many social housing providers and encourage people to reduce their size, and there is no longer the incentive system offered for rent € 10,000 people out of public housing and to allow people with high needs housing to move

• There are many cases in our society good ideas fail because of a lack of common sense and a sensitive application. The fiasco of the guest room will be in this category. If I had to implement this policy would not be retroactive, but part of a future expectation and requirement that people live in space standards they need. If someone wants to live in a big house should not have to pay for it. Applicants performance should not be treated better or worse than taxpayers -. Simply must be fair and equitable treatment

The answer is to try to dismantle the welfare state, the elimination of hypocrisy, overworked and financially more attractive for people. There are alternative methods. If the levels of the disease in the public sector were the same as those of my company (0.4%), while all social housing providers allow their properties on the same day they were available and reduce the arrears what we do, after nearly 18 billion pounds, nearly a quarter of the reductions proposed public spending, it could save.

In this context, the fiscal room should be considered a trivial, heavy drastic measure, it may be the poll of 2013.

Are NKorea's neighbors at risk of nuclear strike?

How to get ahead ... as a director of public health